Resolving Ambiguities in Trusts: Keystone Files Petition for Instructions to Help Trustee Determine How to Dispose of Trust Property
A trust lawyer can help trustees avoid trust disputes by assisting them with obtaining clarification about how trust property should be distributed.
- Keystone News
- 850 Petitions
- Attorney-Client Privilege
- Attorney's Fees
- Caretaker Issues
- Competency/Undue Influence
- Evidence / Procedure
- Fiduciary Misconduct/Removal
- Lis Pendens
- Marriage and Community/Separate Property
- No Contest Clauses
- Non-Probate Transfers
- Petition for Instructions
- Powers of Appointment
- Real Estate Disputes
- Spendthrift Clause
- Statute of Limitations
- Probate News
- Probate Services
- Who We Help
Our client was the trustee of a trust, which had been created by his sister and her husband, both of whom had recently died. The couple had gone to a document preparation service to create and execute their trust, rather than utilizing the services of a qualified estate planning attorney.
The language of the document was unclear about how the proceeds from the sale of the trust’s primary asset – the home of our client’s sister – should be distributed. The instrument simply stated that the home should pass to the couple’s children.
While the language seemed unambiguous on its face, it was possible to interpret it in a variety of ways, since the decedents did not have any children together but had three children each from a previous marriage. Before the decedents had become incapacitated, our client (the trustee of their trust) had spoken to them about whom they wanted to inherit their home.
Since the home had been the sole and separate property of our client’s sister before she got remarried, the couple had informed our client that they wanted their home to pass to the sister’s three children upon their death. The husband’s three children, however, disagreed. Since the trust did not specify to which children the home should pass, they believed that the proceeds from the sale of the home should be divided equally among all the children. A trust dispute ensued.
The client came to our firm for help interpreting the ambiguous language in the trust. Our trust lawyers thought the client’s best route of action would be to file what is known as a Petition for Instructions with the court so that the court could issue an order clarifying the ambiguity.
Petitions for Instructions
If there is ambiguity in a trust, trustees should generally refrain from attempting to resolve it themselves, even if they claim to know the settlor’s original intent. Our client had spoken to the decedents when they had been competent about their intention to leave the home to his sister’s children.
Nevertheless, this could not be surmised from the language of the trust, so Keystone’s probate attorneys thought it would be a good idea for their client to file what is known as a Petition for Instructions. The petition asked the court to interpret the ambiguity in the way our client claimed the decedents would have wanted. In other words, it was requesting that the court order our client, the trustee, to distribute the property to his sister’s children.
When reviewing Petitions for Instructions, the court will generally look to other parts of the trust for context on how to interpret the ambiguous portion of the trust. If it cannot find any clues, it may turn to extrinsic evidence to make a determination. In some instances, the problematic portion of a trust may be so ambiguous that it fails completely, leading the trust asset(s) at issue to pass by way of estate administration.
After reviewing our client’s Petition for Instructions, the court called for something known as a Mandatory Settlement Conference, which required the attendance of all interested parties. Apart from recounting his conversation with the decedents regarding their intentions for who should receive their home upon their death, our client abstained from participating in litigation, including attending the conference, because doing so could have been deemed as breach of his fiduciary duties, or trustee misconduct.
A Trustee’s Fiduciary Duties
The husband’s children were accusing our client of being impartial, claiming that he was favoring his sister’s children. If true, our client’s actions would have been considered a breach of his fiduciary duties.
As a fiduciary, the trustee is obligated to always act in the best interests of the trust and its beneficiaries, and they have a duty to treat all beneficiaries equally, or they could be accused of fiduciary misconduct. This duty of impartiality can get sticky when a trustee is also a beneficiary and is expected to never place their own interests above those of the other trust beneficiaries.
While our client’s claim of having spoken to the decedents about their intentions regarding the disposition of their home might have caused the husband’s children to be suspicious, our client had no horse in the race, since he had not been named as a beneficiary of the trust. Nevertheless, he deferred to the court for instructions on how to make the trust fund distribution.
Another way our client upheld his fiduciary duties was by not participating in litigation (other than filing the Petition for Instructions to initiate it), allowing the heirs to litigate the matter and reach an agreement among themselves.
The client had acted prudently before hiring Keystone, opening one bank account to hold the proceeds from the sale of the home and another bank account for the residue (i.e., the trust assets that were not assigned to anyone, not accounted for, or were failed gifts, etc.). These separate bank accounts streamlined his trustee responsibilities down the road when he had to distribute funds to beneficiaries from the bank account containing the sale proceeds and utilize the funds in the residue account to cover expenses incurred over the course of administration.
Breaching fiduciary duties is a serious form of trustee misconduct, so it is important for trustees to avoid doing so at all costs. If it is proven that a trustee breached their fiduciary duties, they could face trustee removal or suspension, and possibly even be surcharged. Depending on the gravity of the misconduct, they may also be held liable for covering the plaintiff’s attorney’s fees and costs.
Trustees should strongly consider hiring a skilled trust and estate lawyer to help guide them through the trust administration process. This way, they can rest easy knowing they are fulfilling their duties ethically and diligently.
An In-Depth Look Into Keystone’s Ambiguous Trust Case
Online estate planning services for preparing wills and trusts – whether they are a do-it-yourself cloud software solution or an in-person document preparation company – can seem like an inexpensive and efficient alternative to retaining an estate planning attorney to draft documents.
However, using these services often comes with significant drawbacks — as they typically employ a cookie cutter, one-size-fits-all approach to preparing estate planning documents that does not take into account complex elements of people’s estates and trusts.
The documents created by document preparers too often present ambiguities, which not only can cause will and trust disputes among interested parties, but can also lead to litigation that drains an estate or trust of its resources before any distributions are made.
In this case, the wording of the trust at issue may not have been problematic had the decedents only had one set of biological children between them. However, because each of the decedents had three children from a prior marriage, they were not specific enough in their declaration that their home should go to their children, if their intention had been for the home to go specifically to the sister’s children.
For the most part, our client’s interpretation of the trust instrument carried weight, as the settlement reached by the beneficiaries called for the majority of the proceeds from the sale of the home to be distributed to the sister’s children. The husband’s three children received a portion of the proceeds, but it was a fraction of what they would have received had the proceeds been divided equally among the six children.
The residue account covered trustee compensation, the expenses related to the court hearing, and all other expenses incurred over the course of administration.
With Keystone’s support and guidance, the trustee managed to uphold the final wishes of the decedents, protect himself against liabilities, and receive the compensation to which he was entitled for his work administering the trust.
As I began to manage my sister’s and her husband’s living trust, I knew I would need a qualified firm with the proper trust and probate credentials…They handled a tough situation, marshaled it through the courts and beneficiary negotiations, and most important, protected me against liability. At all times, I was kept apprised of what was going on… Look no further. This is the firm you want.