Skip to content
  • Latest
2024 Success Stories
  • Call Today: 310.444.9060
  • Probate Services
    ▼
    • Trust & Will Disputes
    • Fiduciary Misconduct
    • Property Disputes
    • Elder Financial Abuse
    • Trust & Estate Administration
    • Conservatorship
    • Guardianship
    • Probate Appeals
  • Who We Help
    ▼
    • Executor / Administrator
    • Trustee
    • Beneficiary
    • Spouse
    • Power of Attorney
    • Conservator
    • Guardian
    • Creditor
  • Our Firm
    ▼
    • Attorneys
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • 10th Anniversary
  • Learn
    ▼
    • Blog
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletters
    • Testimonials
    • Whitepapers
  • Request a Consultation
  • Probate Services
    • Trust & Will Disputes
    • Fiduciary Misconduct
    • Property Disputes
    • Elder Financial Abuse
    • Trust & Estate Administration
    • Conservatorship
    • Guardianship
    • Probate Appeals
  • Who We Help
    • Executor / Administrator
    • Trustee
    • Beneficiary
    • Spouse
    • Power of Attorney
    • Conservator
    • Guardian
    • Creditor
  • Our Firm
    • Attorneys
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • 10th Anniversary
  • Learn
    • Blog
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletters
    • Testimonials
    • Whitepapers
  • Request a Consultation
  • Probate Services
    • Trust & Will Disputes
    • Fiduciary Misconduct
    • Property Disputes
    • Elder Financial Abuse
    • Trust & Estate Administration
    • Conservatorship
    • Guardianship
    • Probate Appeals
  • Who We Help
    • Executor / Administrator
    • Trustee
    • Beneficiary
    • Spouse
    • Power of Attorney
    • Conservator
    • Guardian
    • Creditor
  • Our Firm
    • Attorneys
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • 10th Anniversary
  • Learn
    • Blog
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletters
    • Testimonials
    • Whitepapers
  • Request a Consultation

Home » Blog » Falsely Accused of Elder Abuse: Keystone Proves Decedent Lacked Capacity to Execute New Trust, Securing Disinherited Clients Their Rightful Inheritances

Last Updated: October 30, 2024

Falsely Accused of Elder Abuse: Keystone Proves Decedent Lacked Capacity to Execute New Trust, Securing Disinherited Clients Their Rightful Inheritances

It’s an unfortunate reality that elderly adults are prime targets for physical, psychological and financial abuse. But not every claim of elder abuse is legitimate; sometimes claims are falsified with the intent of reducing or eliminating the alleged abusers’ potential inheritances — which is what occurred in this case.

If a person has been falsely accused of elder abuse, it is crucial for them to have an experienced probate lawyer by their side, because if the claimant is successful in proving the abuse, they could end up paying handsomely for their alleged misconduct.

Search

Overview

There are certain red flags that can call the validity of a decedent’s will or trust into question. For example, if a will or trust is executed mere days before a decedent’s death and strips the beneficiaries under the decedent’s previous estate planning documents of their inheritances, it would not be stretch to surmise the document may have been obtained through unethical means. Perhaps someone close to the decedent unduly influenced them or perpetrated another form of elder financial abuse against them to compel them to make these changes to their estate plan.

In this Keystone case, the estranged son of the decedent reemerged in the decedent’s life six months before she died to try to get himself named as the sole trust beneficiary of her trust by bringing false allegations of elder abuse against Keystone’s clients — the decedent’s grandchildren — to try to have them disinherited. By claiming the decedent was unable to care for herself or protect herself against physical and financial abuse at the hands of her grandchildren, who had been the primary beneficiaries of her original trust, he was able to obtain a temporary conservatorship, and later, a permanent conservatorship, over the decedent’s person and estate.

These actions set in motion a devastating turn of events that resulted in the decedent’s estranged son taking the decedent to an estate planning attorney to execute a new trust where he would be named as the sole beneficiary. The decedent would die soon after.

When Keystone’s clients learned that their grandmother, who practically had raised them, had cut them out of her new trust, they knew something was amiss and turned to Keystone’s trust and will dispute attorneys for help.

TELL US WHAT HAPPENED. WE’LL BE IN TOUCH SOON.

Wrongfully Accused of Financial Elder Abuse

Financial abuse can be as devastating to victims as other forms of abuse. What’s worse, it’s often perpetrated by close acquaintances or family members of the victim. But, unlike physical and psychological abuse, financial abuse is more likely to occur with the tacit acknowledgment and consent of the elderly person — usually as a result of undue influence — which can make it more challenging to detect and litigate.

Because of their old age, and possible social isolation and declining mental competence, elderly and dependent adults are prime targets for financial abuse. Luckily, laws have been put into place to protect these vulnerable members of society.

The court takes charges of elder financial abuse very seriously, regardless of how severe the alleged abuse was or who the accused are. But, what happens when someone has been wrongfully accused of elder financial abuse?

The consequences can be dire for the alleged abusers if a qualified probate lawyer is not retained to defend them.

“A finding of financial elder abuse in the context of a probate action can have serious consequences,” says Joshua D. Taylor, a partner at Keystone who supervised the case. “For example, the court could issue an order prohibiting the abuser from inheriting from the decedent, or the court could order the abuser pay the opposing party’s attorney’s fees, or the court could order the abuser to pay enhanced damages.”

A Closer Look Into Why the Decedent’s New Trust Was Invalid

Keystone’s clients had practically been raised by the decedent after the death of their father, but once the decedent had entered old age, it was they who were caring for the decedent and tending to her needs. They were so close with the decedent she had named them the primary beneficiaries of her trust, despite having a son.

This son, who had been estranged, saw an opportunity to get himself a greater inheritance from the decedent’s trust by falsifying claims of elder abuse against Keystone’s clients and using those claims to petition for conservatorship over the decedent. The son raised enough concern about his mother’s inability to care for herself and protect herself from the alleged abuse of her grandchildren that the court granted him the type of conservatorship he had requested.

For reference, conservators are individuals who have been granted the legal authority to manage the financial affairs and/or daily life of an adult who is is unable to handle these aspects of their lives on their own due to advanced age or physical or mental limitations.

Conservators are fiduciaries, which means that it’s their duty to act in the best interest of the conserved person (called the conservatee) at all times. Unfortunately, there is no guarantee they won’t engage in conservatorship abuse or another form of fiduciary misconduct, as demonstrated by this case.

Just weeks after the decedent’s son was granted temporary conservatorship over his mother, he hired an estate planning attorney to execute a new trust for the decedent — this voided the trust the decedent had executed three years prior. The previous version of the decedent’s trust had left just a fraction of the trust estate to the decedent’s estranged son and the majority of it to the son who hadn’t been estranged. But since the latter son died, his portion of the trust estate was to pass to his children, Keystone’s clients. The new trust, however, stripped Keystone’s clients of their inheritances because it named the decedent’s estranged son as the sole beneficiary.

An investigation by Adult Protective Services found the elder abuse accusations levied against Keystone’s clients to be unsupported. Testimony from the decedent’s court-appointed attorney in the conservatorship action also confirmed that Keystone’s clients had done nothing wrong. What wasn’t up for debate, however, was that the decedent’s mental capacity had been failing — which is why the proposed conservatorship had been granted.

What is unusual about this case is the fact the decedent was permitted to execute a new trust while being under conservatorship without first obtaining an opinion about her competence. To be placed under conservatorship, the court would have had to find that the proposed conservatee lacked the capacity to adequately resist fraud and undue influence, or to make important personal and/or financial decisions independently. And since a requirement for anyone executing a will or trust is that they are competent and free of undue influence, it is logical to assume the decedent lacked the requisite contractual capacity — one of the highest standards of capacity — to execute a new trust.

However, the estate planning attorney who drafted the decedent’s new trust was inexperienced in estate planning and had not been provided with information about the decedent’s mental incapacity when he prepared the trust. Instead, once the new trust was drawn up, he went to the decedent’s hospital room, where she was receiving palliative care, to get her signature on the purported instrument. The decedent passed three days later.

“It is unusual and highly suspect and should have set off red flags with the estate planning attorney,” Taylor says. “One of our arguments in the trust litigation was that because the decedent was under a conservatorship at the time the new trust was signed, that, by itself, should cause the new trust to be invalidated.”

Results

In the end, Keystone successfully defended its clients against the claims of elder abuse, which cleared the way for the clients to receive the majority of the decedent’s assets when the case settled at mediation.

At mediation, Keystone argued that the new trust was invalid on account of the decedent having signed it from her deathbed while under a conservatorship — these facts suggested that the decedent had lacked the capacity to make such a sweeping change to her estate plan.

The Takeaway

Unfortunately, it is not uncommon for an estranged family member to turn up toward the end of an elder’s life and use their influence to compel them to change a will or trust. As in the case of Keystone’s clients, bad actors may even levy false accusations of elder abuse against the decedent’s loved ones to get what they want.

Whether you are bringing a claim of elder financial abuse against someone, or defending yourself against a claim, Keystone’s probate lawyers can help you navigate the process and secure a favorable outcome.

Learn More

Have an elder financial abuse case on your hands? Learn how we can help.

Did a decedent drastically alter their will or trust at the urging of someone close to them? Do they have assets that cannot be found?

Elder financial abuse is perpetrated against countless vulnerable adults every day. Whether you are a loved one of a decedent trying to recover assets belonging to their estate or trust, or you are yourself a victim of financial abuse, Keystone’s skilled team of probate attorneys can help investigate your claim and recover any assets that were lost to the abuse.

Request a free consultation today.

Request a Consultation
Share Post
PrevPreviousInvalidating a Will and Trust on Account of Lack of Capacity and Undue Influence: Can Estate Documents Signed with an “X” and a Will Handwritten by a Caregiver Hold Up in Court?
Read NextFamily Inheritance Issues: Client Wanted Her Rightful Share of the Family Business; Keystone Gets Her the Entire CompanyNext
Related Articles
thumb-vega-case-study
Invalidating a Will and Trust on Account of Lack of Capacity and Undue Influence: Can Estate Documents Signed with an “X” and a Will Handwritten by a Caregiver Hold Up in Court?
Read More
COVID-19 & Temporary Conservatorship
COVID-19 and Temporary Conservatorship: Keystone’s Use of Conservatorship Proceedings Potentially Save the Life of Client’s Elderly Mother
Read More
thumb-family-inheritance-issues-bullies-never-win-case-study
Family Inheritance Issues: Client Wanted Her Rightful Share of the Family Business; Keystone Gets Her the Entire Company
Read More
Subscribe to The Keystone Quarterly  

Stay up to date with the latest news in the exciting world of probate law through our quarterly newsletter, The Keystone Quarterly. 

Each issue provides insight into the latest probate developments, delves into some of Keystone’s more interesting cases, and gives important updates about our firm. The Keystone Quarterly is a must-read for attorneys and clients alike.

Linkedin Instagram Facebook
Contact
  • 11300 West Olympic Blvd.
    Suite 910
    Los Angeles, CA 90064
  • 310.444.9060
Contact Us
Linkedin Instagram Facebook
Company
  • Our Firm
  • Attorneys
  • Staff
  • Careers
  • 10th Anniversary
Probate Services
  • Trust & Will Disputes
  • Fiduciary Misconduct
  • Property Disputes
  • Elder Financial Abuse
  • Trust & Estate Administration
  • Conservatorship
  • Guardianship
  • Probate Appeals
Who We Help
  • Executor / Administrator
  • Trustee
  • Beneficiary
  • Spouse
  • Power of Attorney
  • Conservator
  • Guardian
  • Creditor
Learn
  • Blog
  • Case Studies
  • Newsletters
  • Testimonials
  • Whitepapers
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Sitemap
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Sitemap

©2025 Keystone Law Group, P.C. All rights reserved.

This website is for general information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Connection to this website, and communication to this law firm via email or other electronic transmission do not constitute an attorney-client relationship with Keystone Law Group, P.C. unless a separate written agreement is signed by you and Keystone Law Group, P.C. as to the nature of any relationship and the amount to be charged for the intended legal services.

Manage Cookie Consent
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}