Even airtight trusts can spark conflict. The Jimmy Buffett family trust battle reveals what can go wrong, and how to prevent it.
When someone takes the time to craft a detailed estate plan — as musical legend and entrepreneur Jimmy Buffett did well before his death in 2023 — the intention is typically to prevent disputes among loved ones after they’re gone.
Unfortunately, even the most carefully crafted estate plans aren’t immune from disputes, as the Jimmy Buffett family trust battle demonstrates. That’s why it’s critical for trustees and beneficiaries to always be prepared for the possibility of trust litigation after a loved one passes.
Jimmy followed estate planning best practices when creating his trust — meticulously structuring it and updating it twice. By all legal standards, it appeared airtight. Yet, despite these precautions, the trust has become the center of a heated dispute between its co-trustees.
At the center of the conflict are Jimmy’s widow, Jane Buffett, and his friend, financial adviser and business manager of 30 years, Richard Mozenter. The two have filed competing lawsuits — Jane in Los Angeles County and Mozenter in Palm Beach County, Florida — each accusing the other of breaching fiduciary duties, mismanaging trust assets and obstructing the trust administration process, among other allegations.
The Jimmy Buffett family trust battle highlights how trust administration can devolve into complex, high-stakes litigation, even when there’s no apparent flaw in the trust itself. From clashing personalities to vague delegation of authority, many factors can trigger long and costly legal disputes — gradually diminishing the very assets trusts are meant to protect.
At Keystone Law Group, our probate litigation attorneys regularly handle cases involving trustee misconduct and disputes among co-trustees. In this article, we’ll examine the legal issues at the core of the Jimmy Buffett family trust case, possible outcomes and key takeaways for families, estate planners and fiduciaries looking to avoid similar disputes.
Whether you’re navigating a trust dispute yourself or simply are curious about how celebrity estate plans can unravel, the Jimmy Buffett case offers a powerful reminder: No trust is entirely conflict-proof, but with the right legal guidance, it’s possible to keep the administration process on course and ensure beneficiaries receive what they’re owed, when they’re owed it.
Section 1
Section 2
Section 3
Section 4
Key Facts to Know About Jimmy Buffet’s Death
Before diving into the co-trustee conflict, it’s helpful to first review key facts about Jimmy Buffett’s death to better understand the backdrop of the case.
When Did Jimmy Buffett Die?
Jimmy died on September 1, 2023, marking the end of an era for countless fans. Yet his legacy lives on through the tropical rock sound and easygoing life philosophy that made him a cultural icon.
How Old Was Jimmy Buffett When He Died?
Jimmy passed away at 76, leaving behind a decades-long career that spanned music, business, and lifestyle branding. His cultural legacy extends far beyond his chart-topping hits, with the Margaritaville franchise standing as perhaps his most significant creation.
How Did Jimmy Buffett Die?
Jimmy died of Merkel cell carcinoma, an aggressive form of skin cancer, according to merkelcell.org. He reportedly had been battling the disease for about four years before his death, but it wasn’t until shortly before his passing that he went public with his diagnosis.
What Was Jimmy Buffett’s Net Worth at Death?
Celebrity Net Worth estimates Jimmy Buffet’s net worth at the time of his death to be approximately $1 billion. He predominantly accumulated this fortune through record sales, concerts, hotels, restaurants, merchandise and licensing deals under his lucrative Margaritaville brand.
Was Jimmy Buffett Survived by Family?
Jimmy is survived by his spouse, Jane; three children, Cameron, Delaney and Savannah; two sisters, Laurie and Lucy; and grandson, Marley, according to the obituary on his official website.
What Is Known About Jimmy Buffett’s Estate Plan?
According to CNBC, Jimmy Buffett’s estate is valued at approximately $275 million and includes far more than just his iconic song catalog. His assets span luxury real estate, private planes, vehicles, musical equipment and — most notably — a lucrative stake in Margaritaville, the multimillion-dollar lifestyle brand of hotels, restaurants, bars and merchandise that epitomized Jimmy’s signature island-inspired image.
Most of these assets were placed into a marital trust designed to carry out Buffett’s wishes after his death. People reports that Buffett originally created the trust in 1990 and amended it in 2017 and again in 2023. The trust is structured to solely benefit his widow, Jane, whom he married in 1977 and who also serves as a co-trustee. The other co-trustee is Mozenter, Jimmy’s longtime financial adviser and business manager.
Jimmy and Jane’s three children — Cameron, Delaney and Savannah — are named as remainder beneficiaries, meaning they will inherit any assets that remain in the trust once Jane passes away.
Why Is There a Battle Over Jimmy Buffett’s Family Trust?
While most trust disputes involve disagreements among trust beneficiaries or issues with the trust’s validity, the legal battle over Jimmy Buffett’s family trust centers on an entirely different problem: a breakdown in communication and cooperation between the trust’s co-trustees, Jane and Mozenter.
Although both were appointed to jointly manage Buffett’s substantial estate and carry out the trust’s terms, mounting tensions and allegations have raised serious concerns about their ability to do so effectively.
Mozenter claims that Jimmy “repeatedly expressed his concerns regarding Jane’s ability to manage and control his assets” and was “very careful to create the trust in a manner that precluded Jane from having actual control over the trust,” according to CNBC. “This fact has made Jane very angry,” Mozenter adds.
It remains to be seen whether Jane’s allegations against Mozenter stem from personal animosity or legitimate concerns surrounding his management of the trust. The same uncertainty surrounds the claims Mozenter has made against Jane.
What Jane Buffett Is Claiming
According to CNBC, Jane’s complaint accuses Mozenter, the trust’s other co-trustee, of acting in a manner toward Jane that is both “openly hostile and adversarial.”
She claims Mozenter has repeatedly refused to provide her with basic financial information about the trust, despite her role as co-trustee. According to her, when she requested information, Mozenter “belittled, disrespected, and condescended” her, rather than acting with transparency.
Another notable point of contention revolves around the $1.7 million in trustee fees Mozenter collects annually to manage the trust, which Jane deems as “enormous.”
In the complaint, it’s noted that Mozenter projected an annual income of $2 million from the trust, implying a return of less than 1%. Jane suggests the low return rate can be attributed to Mozenter’s mismanagement of the trust.
The widow further alleges that Mozenter delayed providing income projections until she enlisted the help of her trusted friend Jeff Bewkes, the former CEO of Time Warner. Only then did Mozenter provide an estimate — one that fell short of covering her annual expenses.
According to the complaint, Mozenter acknowledged that Margaritaville paid out $14 million in distributions over the previous 18 months, but he still declined to offer future income projections. Instead, he allegedly advised Jane to “consider adjustments” to her spending.
For all these reasons, Jane is seeking to axe Mozenter from his role as co-trustee.
What Richard Mozenter Is Claiming
In response to Jane’s allegations, Mozenter filed his own petition seeking Jane’s removal as co‑trustee, The Guardian reports.
According to CNBC, Mozenter’s complaint alleges that Jane has been “completely uncooperative” with Mozenter’s efforts to manage the trust by interfering in business decisions, refusing to meet with him about trust matters and “acting in her own best interests,” which he claims is a breach of her fiduciary duties.
In his complaint, Mozenter asserts that his working relationship has become untenable. He claims Jane has acted in her own interest instead of prioritizing the trust’s goals, which, according to him, undermines the trust’s proper administration.
Overview of Key Issues Raised
While many trusts appoint a single trustee, those that name co-trustees depend on consistent transparency, communication and collaboration. Without these core elements, the trust’s administration can quickly become dysfunctional — sometimes to the detriment of the beneficiaries for whom the trust was created in the first place.
In the case of Jimmy Buffett’s family trust, tensions between co-trustees Jane and Mozenter appear to have reached a breaking point. However, for the trust to be administered properly and in line with Buffett’s wishes, these conflicts must ultimately be resolved.
Below, we break down the key issues fueling the dispute between the co-trustees of Jimmy Buffett’s estate.
How Much Transparency Is Required of Co-Trustees?
Co-trustees generally are obligated to remain fully transparent with one another throughout the trust administration process. This means they must keep each other informed about all significant decisions, consult one another before taking actions that affect the trust and share relevant financial information.
“Transparency isn’t just encouraged — it’s required to prevent mismanagement, promote accountability and protect the interests of the beneficiaries,” says Shawn Kerendian, managing partner at Keystone. “When transparency breaks down, trust disputes like the one involving Jimmy Buffett’s estate can escalate quickly.”
If Mozenter’s claim that the trust was intentionally structured to prevent Jane from exercising meaningful control is true, it still would not relieve him of the obligation to keep her informed. Remember, Jane is the sole beneficiary of the trust — that alone entitles her to transparency and information about the trust’s assets, management and administration.
In short, any restrictions on Jane’s decision-making authority would not negate her right to be kept in the loop; it would simply mean she doesn’t have the power to make or influence certain trust decisions.
Can Co-Trustees Act Independently?
Unilateral decision-making by a co-trustee — without the knowledge or consent of the other co-trustee(s) — can be considered a breach of fiduciary duty by the court. However, some trusts explicitly allow co-trustees to act independently.
In the case of the Jimmy Buffett family trust dispute, a central issue may be whether Mozenter was authorized to make decisions unilaterally or if he was required to obtain Jane’s consent according to the trust’s terms.
If the trust mandates cooperation between co-trustees, then Mozenter’s unilateral actions would likely be deemed a breach of his fiduciary duties.
What Constitutes Mismanagement of Trust Assets?
When mismanagement of trust assets is cited as a cause of action in a fiduciary misconduct matter, it generally means the trustee failed to exercise proper discretion or prudence in carrying out their duties, resulting in financial harm to the trust.
In this case, Jane has implied that Mozenter may have mismanaged certain trust assets. Her concerns do not appear to rise to the level of theft or fraud, but rather focus on what she believes were excessive expenditures or risky investments made without her knowledge or approval.
Whether Mozenter’s actions legally qualify as mismanagement remains unclear. Typically, a determination requires a thorough review of the trust’s financial records — including the original inventory and appraisal, trust accountings and relevant bank statements — to assess whether the trustee’s decisions were unreasonable or harmful.
What Is Reasonable Compensation for a Trustee?
Trustees are generally entitled to compensation for the time and effort they dedicate to managing a trust. Unlike executors and administrators, who must obtain court approval for their fees and are often paid according to a statutory formula, trustees have more discretion in setting and collecting their fees. The main requirement is that trustee compensation be reasonable, proportionate to the work performed and properly documented.
Reasonable trustee compensation can vary depending on the terms of the trust, the complexity of the trusts’ assets, the amount of work the trustee is required to perform, the qualifications of the trustee and how those qualifications were utilized for the trust’s benefit.
It is not uncommon for trustees to compensate with fees between 0.5% and 1.5% of the trust’s total value per year or for trustees to be paid hourly, with professional trustees being paid higher hourly rates than non-professional trustees.
Jane has described Mozenter’s reported trustee fees of $1.7 million per year as “enormous” and “excessive.” While that figure may seem high, it is not necessarily unusual. Professional trustees commonly charge annual fees totaling 1% or more of a trust’s value. Moreover, Mozenter’s background as a CPA may justify higher compensation, as he likely managed complex financial matters in-house without the need for outside advisers.
“The court may review the reasonableness of Mozenter’s fees in light of Jane’s complaint,” says Roee Kaufman, a partner at Keystone. “Based on the information available, the amount charged could raise red flags, as it appears extraordinary and outside industry norms — particularly in light of the fact the trust only generates around $2 million in annual returns on a $275 million trust.”
How Might the Battle Over the Jimmy Buffett Family Trust Play Out? — A Probate Attorney’s Analysis
While the dispute between Jane and Mozenter continues to unfold, several outcomes are possible based on how courts typically resolve conflicts between co-trustees.
Because each party filed suit in a different state, the first step will likely involve determining which court has jurisdiction. Once that is resolved, a judge will consider the merits of each party’s claims and decide the most appropriate course of action.
If the co-trustee relationship has become unworkable, as Mozenter alleges, the court may have little choice but to alter the current arrangement. Courts prioritize the timely and proper administration of trusts, and any dysfunction that threatens that goal must be swiftly addressed.
“Disputes like this one almost always stem from a communication breakdown,” Kerendian states. “Trustees may believe they have full discretion to share — or withhold — information, while beneficiaries are left feeling excluded or left in the dark. This imbalance can quickly lead to mistrust and legal conflict.”
Historically, courts have often favored independent trustees like Mozenter. However, recent trends suggest the tide may be changing. According to CNBC, judges are increasingly siding with spouses — especially those who are also beneficiaries — when trust disputes arise.
Below, we explore the most likely outcomes in the Jimmy Buffett family trust dispute.
Neutral Trustee Is Appointed
The court may determine that the most equitable and practical resolution is to remove both co-trustees and appoint a neutral corporate trustee — such as a trust company or bank. A professional fiduciary can stabilize the situation, ensure the trust is properly administered and reduce the likelihood of further conflict by removing emotional dynamics from day-to-day management.
“While neither side may welcome this result, it’s often the most realistic path forward,” says Kaufman. “The co-trustees’ inability to work together, combined with their personal ties to Jimmy, makes it difficult for either to remain impartial. In that light, a neutral third-party fiduciary may actually be the best-case scenario.”
A Co-Trustee Is Removed
If the court finds that only one trustee has failed to fulfill their duties or is incapable of working cooperatively, it may opt to remove just that individual. While Jane appears to be pushing for Mozenter’s removal, such a decision would require strong evidence of misconduct or an unresolvable conflict between the co-trustees.
Jane may argue that Mozenter’s $1.7 million in trustee fees are excessive, and that earning only $2 million in annual returns on a $275 million trust points to poor management. However, Keystone’s probate attorneys say those numbers don’t automatically indicate a breach of fiduciary duty.
“Trustee compensation must be evaluated in context,” notes Kerendian. “When you’re dealing with an estate worth hundreds of millions, seven-figure fees are not uncommon. And as for the investment returns, not every asset is designed to generate income, as some may require significant upkeep. Without clear evidence of mismanagement, these figures alone don’t signal wrongdoing.”
Co-Trustees Are Ordered to Cooperate or Follow Trust Terms
If trustee removal isn’t warranted, the court may instead issue interim orders requiring the co-trustees to work together and follow the trust’s terms more closely.
To encourage cooperation, the court might clarify what information must be disclosed between co-trustees, specify which decisions require joint approval or mandate regular accountings. If either trustee fails to comply with these directives, the court could impose consequences.
This solution allows the court to enforce oversight and accountability without undermining Jimmy’s final wishes or altering the structure of the trust—at least for the time being.
Dispute Settles Outside of Court
Most trust disputes are resolved through settlement rather than trial — and this case may be no exception. A potential agreement between the co-trustees could involve reducing the authority of one or both trustees, adding layers of oversight or even offering financial compensation in exchange for one trustee stepping down.
While the specific terms of any settlement remain speculative, mediation is a common and effective tool in resolving probate conflicts, particularly when minimizing legal costs and administrative delays is a priority.
“Mediation allows the parties to maintain some control over the outcome, rather than leaving it entirely in the hands of a judge,” says Kaufman. “It’s often the best path forward when co-trustees are at an impasse.”
The Bottom Line: Even Well-Planned Trusts Can Lead to Conflict
If the battle over the Jimmy Buffett family trust teaches us anything, it’s that even the most thoughtfully crafted estate plans can unravel when personal tensions or ambiguities go unaddressed. Still, with the right legal guidance, the fallout from a trust dispute can often be minimized or avoided altogether.
Fortunately, there are proactive steps you can take when creating a trust to help prevent future conflict.
First, have open conversations about your final wishes well before your passing. A well-drafted trust is only part of the equation; making sure your loved ones understand your intentions is just as important. Buffett likely had top-tier legal and financial advisers, but even the most airtight documents can’t fully prevent conflict when complex dynamics are involved.
Second, consider appointing a neutral trustee from the outset. While naming a family member or close friend might seem like the obvious choice, it can increase the risk of disagreement. A professional fiduciary may be better equipped to make impartial decisions and defuse tension. They’re not influenced by family loyalties and are more likely to act in the best interest of all the beneficiaries.
Finally, if you’re a beneficiary who suspects something is wrong with a trust, don’t wait. Early legal intervention can protect your rights and help prevent irreversible damage to the trust.
As Kerendian puts it, “When it comes to trust litigation, the earlier you act — and the more informed your decisions — the better your chances of a fair outcome.”
Are you involved in a dispute involving a trust?
If you have concerns about the terms of a trust, trustee misconduct or your rights as a beneficiary, Keystone’s skilled legal team is here to help. Our attorneys focus exclusively on probate litigation and administration, bringing deep expertise and insight to every case. We work tirelessly to protect your interests and help you secure the inheritance you’re entitled to. Contact us today to learn how we can support you through your trust or estate dispute.
