Skip to content
  • Latest
2024 Success Stories
  • Call Today: 310.444.9060
  • Probate Services
    ▼
    • Trust & Will Disputes
    • Fiduciary Misconduct
    • Property Disputes
    • Elder Financial Abuse
    • Trust & Estate Administration
    • Conservatorship
    • Guardianship
    • Probate Appeals
  • Who We Help
    ▼
    • Executor / Administrator
    • Trustee
    • Beneficiary
    • Spouse
    • Power of Attorney
    • Conservator
    • Guardian
    • Creditor
  • Our Firm
    ▼
    • Attorneys
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • 10th Anniversary
  • Learn
    ▼
    • Blog
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletters
    • Testimonials
    • Whitepapers
  • Request a Consultation
  • Probate Services
    • Trust & Will Disputes
    • Fiduciary Misconduct
    • Property Disputes
    • Elder Financial Abuse
    • Trust & Estate Administration
    • Conservatorship
    • Guardianship
    • Probate Appeals
  • Who We Help
    • Executor / Administrator
    • Trustee
    • Beneficiary
    • Spouse
    • Power of Attorney
    • Conservator
    • Guardian
    • Creditor
  • Our Firm
    • Attorneys
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • 10th Anniversary
  • Learn
    • Blog
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletters
    • Testimonials
    • Whitepapers
  • Request a Consultation
  • Probate Services
    • Trust & Will Disputes
    • Fiduciary Misconduct
    • Property Disputes
    • Elder Financial Abuse
    • Trust & Estate Administration
    • Conservatorship
    • Guardianship
    • Probate Appeals
  • Who We Help
    • Executor / Administrator
    • Trustee
    • Beneficiary
    • Spouse
    • Power of Attorney
    • Conservator
    • Guardian
    • Creditor
  • Our Firm
    • Attorneys
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • 10th Anniversary
  • Learn
    • Blog
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletters
    • Testimonials
    • Whitepapers
  • Request a Consultation

Home » Blog » Beneficiaries Fight Over Control of Musician Tom Petty’s Estate

Last Updated: April 8, 2025

Beneficiaries Fight Over Control of Musician Tom Petty’s Estate

Search

When Rock & Roll Hall of Fame musician Tom Petty died at 66 from an accidental drug overdose on October 2, 2017, plans for his ongoing musical legacy appeared to be set. His assets would be distributed pursuant to his extensive 77-page revocable trust administered by his second wife, Dana York Petty, with input from his biological daughters, Adria Petty and Annakim Violette.

When properly set up, a trust can efficiently manage and distribute assets, as well as avoid lengthy (and, at times, costly) probate court proceedings. However, probate court is in fact where Petty’s beneficiaries have ended up since best laid plans cannot account for the vicissitudes of a blended family.

On April 2, 2019, Dana filed a petition in the Los Angeles Superior Court requesting that the probate court appoint a manager to supervise decision-making for Petty’s estate. Adria in turn filed her own competing petition alleging that York hasn’t administered the trust properly and that all the beneficiaries should have an equal say in how the musician’s afterlife musical releases should be handled (An American Treasure and The Best of Everything albums have already been released since his death).

Petty’s trust provides that his daughters are “entitled to participate equally” in decisions regarding Petty’s catalog. Petty’s daughters interpret this provision to mean that Dana and each daughter gets one vote out of three, giving the daughters a majority two-thirds vote. Another interpretation is that Dana is entitled to one-half of the decision-making vote and his daughters together share the other one-half vote, thereby demonstrating the ambiguity of the phrase “participate equally.”

As usually is the case with high profile, celebrity probate matters, salacious allegations are receiving attention. Dana’s petition alleges that Adria wanted to leave “and the Heartbreakers” off the artist name on the Best of Everything album and gave founding members of the Heart breakers an earful about it in a lengthy email. Adria’s petition for all intents and purposes seeks to freeze York out from decisions as to her father’s musical catalog.

On May 15, 2019, Adria and Annakim filed a civil suit in Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of Petty Unlimited LLC against Dana, among other Defendants, alleging that Dana was diverting business opportunities from Petty Unlimited LLC, a company which was set up pursuant to Petty’s will. Instead, his daughters allege that Dana has been diverting Petty’s musical catalogue and intellectual property assets to Tom Petty Legacy LLC, a separate entity that she formed.The civil complaint accuses Dana with, among other causes of action, breach of fiduciary duty, unfair competition, and unjust enrichment. With their complaint, Petty’s daughters seek more than $5 million in damages, in addition to control of all Petty’s assets.

As Robert Burns’’ wrote in his 1786 poem To a Mouse, “The best laid schemes o’ mice an’ men…Gang aft a-gley, [often go awry].” Or to apply it to the family Petty situation, the best laid estate plans can go awry when a blended family is involved.

Share Post
PrevPreviousAmber Heard & Johnny Depp Divorce Public Legal Saga Continues
Read NextProbate of Kristoff St. John’s Estate Has Soap Opera Story LinesNext

Related Articles

KLG-VERLAN-POST
Super Lawyers Selects Partner Verlan Kwan as One of the Top 50 Women Lawyers
Read More
KLG-SHAWN-POST
Managing Partner Shawn Kerendian Recognized as a Leader of Influence: Thriving in Their 40’s
Read More
shutterstock_2304763731-cropped
2024 Success Stories
Read More
Signing contract and buying agricultural machines and farming equipment
Restoring Ownership of Home — and Justice — for Financially Exploited Elder
Read More
Close up of hands using phone
Shutting Down a Scandal: Protecting a Son’s Legacy From Influencer’s Social Media Attacks 
Read More
talking with trustee
Keeping the Peace in Decades-Old Family Feud
Read More
senior caucasian man open mail letter sign contract document at home
Securing Multimillion-Dollar Settlement for Nephew of Hollywood Icon Without Litigation
Read More
Angry neighbours having argument near fence outdoors
Using a Summary Judgment Motion to Shut Down a Baseless Trust Dispute
Read More
Contract, signature and attorney consulting a client in his office with legal paperwork or agreement
Safeguarding Daughter’s Inheritance From Trust Mismanagement
Read More
Subscribe to The Keystone Quarterly  

Stay up to date with the latest news in the exciting world of probate law through our quarterly newsletter, The Keystone Quarterly. 

Each issue provides insight into the latest probate developments, delves into some of Keystone’s more interesting cases, and gives important updates about our firm. The Keystone Quarterly is a must-read for attorneys and clients alike.

Linkedin Instagram Facebook
Contact
  • 11300 West Olympic Blvd.
    Suite 910
    Los Angeles, CA 90064
  • 310.444.9060
Contact Us
Linkedin Instagram Facebook
Company
  • Our Firm
  • Attorneys
  • Staff
  • Careers
  • 10th Anniversary
Probate Services
  • Trust & Will Disputes
  • Fiduciary Misconduct
  • Property Disputes
  • Elder Financial Abuse
  • Trust & Estate Administration
  • Conservatorship
  • Guardianship
  • Probate Appeals
Who We Help
  • Executor / Administrator
  • Trustee
  • Beneficiary
  • Spouse
  • Power of Attorney
  • Conservator
  • Guardian
  • Creditor
Learn
  • Blog
  • Case Studies
  • Newsletters
  • Testimonials
  • Whitepapers
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Sitemap
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Sitemap

©2025 Keystone Law Group, P.C. All rights reserved.

This website is for general information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Connection to this website, and communication to this law firm via email or other electronic transmission do not constitute an attorney-client relationship with Keystone Law Group, P.C. unless a separate written agreement is signed by you and Keystone Law Group, P.C. as to the nature of any relationship and the amount to be charged for the intended legal services.

Manage Cookie Consent
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}