Skip to content
  • Latest
2024 Success Stories
  • Call Today: 310.444.9060
  • Probate Services
    ▼
    • Trust & Will Disputes
    • Fiduciary Misconduct
    • Property Disputes
    • Elder Financial Abuse
    • Trust & Estate Administration
    • Conservatorship
    • Guardianship
    • Probate Appeals
  • Who We Help
    ▼
    • Executor / Administrator
    • Trustee
    • Beneficiary
    • Spouse
    • Power of Attorney
    • Conservator
    • Guardian
    • Creditor
  • Our Firm
    ▼
    • Attorneys
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • 10th Anniversary
  • Learn
    ▼
    • Blog
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletters
    • Testimonials
    • Whitepapers
  • Request a Consultation
  • Probate Services
    • Trust & Will Disputes
    • Fiduciary Misconduct
    • Property Disputes
    • Elder Financial Abuse
    • Trust & Estate Administration
    • Conservatorship
    • Guardianship
    • Probate Appeals
  • Who We Help
    • Executor / Administrator
    • Trustee
    • Beneficiary
    • Spouse
    • Power of Attorney
    • Conservator
    • Guardian
    • Creditor
  • Our Firm
    • Attorneys
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • 10th Anniversary
  • Learn
    • Blog
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletters
    • Testimonials
    • Whitepapers
  • Request a Consultation
  • Probate Services
    • Trust & Will Disputes
    • Fiduciary Misconduct
    • Property Disputes
    • Elder Financial Abuse
    • Trust & Estate Administration
    • Conservatorship
    • Guardianship
    • Probate Appeals
  • Who We Help
    • Executor / Administrator
    • Trustee
    • Beneficiary
    • Spouse
    • Power of Attorney
    • Conservator
    • Guardian
    • Creditor
  • Our Firm
    • Attorneys
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • 10th Anniversary
  • Learn
    • Blog
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletters
    • Testimonials
    • Whitepapers
  • Request a Consultation

Home » Blog » Courts Have the Equitable Power to Award Attorney’s Fees Against a Beneficiary’s Share of a Trust

Last Updated: April 10, 2024

Courts Have the Equitable Power to Award Attorney’s Fees Against a Beneficiary’s Share of a Trust

Search

If you are a beneficiary of a trust, a recent ruling in Pizarro v. Reynoso[i] may impact your share. In Pizarro, a settlor’s trust nominated his granddaughter to act as trustee. Following his passing, his granddaughter, in her capacity as trustee, sold real property belonging to the trust to her mother, the settlor’s daughter. The settlor’s grandson and son filed petitions for relief under Probate Code section 17200, seeking to set aside the sale of the real property. The petitions were both denied by the court as frivolous, bad faith litigation, and the grandson, son, and daughter[ii] were ordered to pay the trustee’s fees and costs from their own beneficial shares of the Trust.

Notably, these fee awards were not based on any specific statutory authority, but instead on the court’s inherent equitable powers to respond to bad faith litigation: “the court’s broad equitable powers over trust assets are sufficient to justify an award of attorney fees and costs against any trust beneficiary who takes an unfounded position and litigates in bad faith, causing the trust to incur fees and costs.”[iii] Relying on Rudnick v. Rudnick,[iv] the trial court awarded attorney’s fees and costs against the settlor’s daughter, son, and grandson as charges against their shares of the Trust, and to the extent that the awarded fees and costs exceeded such shares, they would be personally liable for the fees and costs incurred.

On appeal, the grandson and daughter argued, among other things, that the award of fees and costs against them was improper. But the Pizarro court affirmed the lower court’s ruling, holding that a Court has the inherent equitable power to award a trustee’s attorney’s fees and costs against the trust shares of a beneficiary, but (absent independent statutory authority) does not have the equitable power to make a beneficiary personally liable for a trustee’s attorney’s fees and costs.

This decision is in line with the trend in which courts have found the equitable power to charge the trustee’s attorney’s fees and costs to a beneficiary’s share of the trust estate when the beneficiary initiates the litigation in bad faith.[v] This decision continues to be good news for trustees who find themselves in the position of having to defend the trust against improper litigation from beneficiaries. The court’s reasoning appears to be that a court’s equitable power over a trust allows it to protect trust assets for the benefit of those beneficiaries who were not initiating litigation in bad faith and as an incentive for the trustee to defend the trust against bad faith litigation.

Of equal significance, however, is the court’s unwillingness to use its equitable powers to charge a trustee’s fees and costs against a beneficiary’s personal assets. Thus, in cases with relatively small trust shares, a beneficiary’s share of the Trust may be insufficient to fully satisfy a judgment for fees and costs, and (absent an independent statutory or contractual basis to award attorney’s fees[vi]) a judgment cannot be enforced against an offending beneficiary’s personal assets.

__________________________

[i] Pizarro v. Reynoso (2017) 10 Cal.App.5th 172.

[ii] Remarkably, the trial court in Pizarro held the daughter liable for fees and costs even though she did not initiate a petition in this action, but instead offered false testimony at trial: “Nothing in this analysis . . . requires instigation of an action against the trust by the offending beneficiary as a prerequisite to charging attorney fees. . .  [B]asing one’s assertions on false testimony . . . is, by definition, taking an unfounded position.”

[iii] Pizarro v. Reynoso (2017) 10 Cal.App.5th at 186.

[iv] Rudnick v. Rudnick (2009) 179 Cal.App.4th 1328.

[v] See, e.g. Rudnick at 1335; Estate of Ivey (1994) 22 Cal.App.4th 873.

[vi] See, e.g., Prob. C. § 17211 (authorizing an award of attorney’s fees in response to a bad faith opposition to a trustee’s account).

Share Post
PrevPreviousCalifornia Electronic Signature Policy: Court Expressly Permits Filings with E-Signatures
Read NextTrustees Beware: Limitations of the Attorney-Client PrivilegeNext

Related Articles

shutterstock_2304763731-cropped
2024 Success Stories
Read More
Signing contract and buying agricultural machines and farming equipment
Restoring Ownership of Home — and Justice — for Financially Exploited Elder
Read More
Close up of hands using phone
Shutting Down a Scandal: Protecting a Son’s Legacy From Influencer’s Social Media Attacks 
Read More
talking with trustee
Keeping the Peace in Decades-Old Family Feud
Read More
senior caucasian man open mail letter sign contract document at home
Securing Multimillion-Dollar Settlement for Nephew of Hollywood Icon Without Litigation
Read More
Angry neighbours having argument near fence outdoors
Using a Summary Judgment Motion to Shut Down a Baseless Trust Dispute
Read More
Contract, signature and attorney consulting a client in his office with legal paperwork or agreement
Safeguarding Daughter’s Inheritance From Trust Mismanagement
Read More
Office Insurance protects the home for protection and care
Can a Power of Attorney Change Ownership of Property?
Read More
accounting of a trust
What to Do When a Trustee Refuses to Give Accounting
Read More
Subscribe to The Keystone Quarterly  

Stay up to date with the latest news in the exciting world of probate law through our quarterly newsletter, The Keystone Quarterly. 

Each issue provides insight into the latest probate developments, delves into some of Keystone’s more interesting cases, and gives important updates about our firm. The Keystone Quarterly is a must-read for attorneys and clients alike.

Linkedin Instagram Facebook
Contact
  • 11300 West Olympic Blvd.
    Suite 910
    Los Angeles, CA 90064
  • 310.444.9060
Contact Us
Linkedin Instagram Facebook
Company
  • Our Firm
  • Attorneys
  • Staff
  • Careers
  • 10th Anniversary
Probate Services
  • Trust & Will Disputes
  • Fiduciary Misconduct
  • Property Disputes
  • Elder Financial Abuse
  • Trust & Estate Administration
  • Conservatorship
  • Guardianship
  • Probate Appeals
Who We Help
  • Executor / Administrator
  • Trustee
  • Beneficiary
  • Spouse
  • Power of Attorney
  • Conservator
  • Guardian
  • Creditor
Learn
  • Blog
  • Case Studies
  • Newsletters
  • Testimonials
  • Whitepapers
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Sitemap
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Sitemap

©2025 Keystone Law Group, P.C. All rights reserved.

This website is for general information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Connection to this website, and communication to this law firm via email or other electronic transmission do not constitute an attorney-client relationship with Keystone Law Group, P.C. unless a separate written agreement is signed by you and Keystone Law Group, P.C. as to the nature of any relationship and the amount to be charged for the intended legal services.

Manage Cookie Consent
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}