The Richard Simmons estate dispute demonstrates why early legal guidance is essential in preventing conflicts and costly litigation. Consult with a Keystone probate attorney today.
Following the death of fitness icon Richard Simmons, a bitter legal dispute erupted between some of his family members and his longtime housekeeper, transforming what might have been a standard trust and estate administration into a highly publicized legal feud, which currently is stalling administrative progress.
At the center of the conflict are questions about who has decision-making authority over Richard Simmons’ assets, whether certain posthumous actions crossed ethical, legal or fiduciary boundaries, and whether verbal promises can be enforced without proper documentation.
According to media reports and court filings, the dispute began just five days after the housekeeper discovered Simmons’ lifeless body. Her attorneys allege that she became “the unsuspecting victim of a nefarious scheme” by some family members attempting to take unilateral control of his trust, in which she was named co-trustee.
Court documents reveal that the housekeeper requested family members wait until Simmons’ body was laid to rest before meeting with an attorney. Nevertheless, immediately following an open-casket viewing, Simmons’ brother and sister-in-law took her to a law firm meeting regarding his financial affairs.
At that meeting, she was informed she had been named both a beneficiary of the estate and a co-trustee of his trust. Lacking legal representation, being in a vulnerable emotional state and with English not being her first language, she signed away her co-trustee rights at the insistence of Richard Simmons’ family members without fully understanding the consequences.
Since then, the housekeeper has petitioned the court for reinstatement as co-trustee, with Richard Simmons’ family members opposing the action, claiming it’s fueled by greed. Still, the court appointed her interim co-trustee pending a final decision regarding trust authority.
Because of ongoing tensions and the clash between co-trustees, Richard Simmons’ brother recently filed a petition for appointment of a special administrator to halt the legal squabbling that’s been stalling the administration’s progress. In addition, he requested to strip the housekeeper of her beneficiary status, citing alleged violations of the estate’s no-contest clause.
Additional disputes involve alleged mismanagement of Richard Simmons’ assets, with the housekeeper asserting that baseless litigation brought by his brother has significantly reduced estate funds available to beneficiaries and that excessive spending, such as round-the-clock security for Richard Simmons’ home in the Hollywood Hills, has further strained resources.
Although the house is now on the market, the housekeeper was accused of refusing to vacate the property, remaining in it for 76 days after the late celebrity’s death. It’s also being alleged that the housekeeper took valuable personal property worth approximately $1 million on her way out, which she has refused to return. She claims the items were gifts from Simmons — though no documentation currently supports that claim.
While the high-profile nature of the dispute has drawn public attention, the underlying legal issues are familiar in probate and trust litigation. In this article, Keystone examines the key legal issues in the Richard Simmons estate dispute and the broader probate lessons it offers for families, fiduciaries and anyone seeking to avoid similar conflicts following the death of a loved one.
Section 1
Section 2
Section 3
Section 4
Section 5
Who Is Richard Simmons?
Richard Simmons was a well-known American fitness guru and motivational speaker who was beloved for his encouraging attitude, theatrical personality, boundless energy and workout programs that were enjoyable and accessible to all body types.
How Did Richard Simmons Die?
The Los Angeles County Medical Examiner officially ruled Richard Simmons’ cause of death as “sequelae of blunt traumatic injuries,” stemming from a fall he suffered days earlier, with complications from heart disease contributing to his passing.
“It was reported Mr. Simmons experienced a fall on July 11 and spent the following day in bed,” the medical examiner’s office said. “He was found unresponsive on his bedroom floor on the morning of July 13, and 9-1-1 was called.”
When Did Richard Simmons Die?
Richard Simmons died on July 13, 2024, at his Hollywood Hills home in Los Angeles. His housekeeper discovered his lifeless body in his bedroom, according to reports.
How Old Was Richard Simmons When He Died?
Richard Simmons was 76 years old when he died, having lived from 1948 to 2024.
What Was Richard Simmons’ Net Worth at the Time of His Death?
Richard Simmons’ net worth at the time of his death was estimated at approximately $20 million — a fortune built through a sprawling fitness empire and personal brand centered on making exercise accessible, inclusive and enjoyable. His success stemmed from ventures including the iconic “Sweatin’ to the Oldies” video series, television programs, exercise studios, best-selling books and a wide range of fitness products and endorsements.
Who Is in Richard Simmons’ Family?
Because Richard Simmons never married and did not have children, he is survived only by his brother, Leonard “Lenny” Simmons — the family member now engaged in a legal dispute with Simmons’ longtime housekeeper.
Did Richard Simmons Have a Twin Brother?
Although Richard Simmons and his brother, Lenny Simmons, shared a striking physical resemblance, they were not twins. That said, the two reportedly maintained a close familial relationship throughout Richard Simmons’ life.
Who Is Teresa Reveles, and What Was Her Relationship With Richard Simmons?
Teresa Reveles served as Richard Simmons’ longtime housekeeper and trusted confidante for nearly 36 years. She began working for Simmons around 1988 and remained by his side until his death.
While Reveles was not related to Simmons by blood, their relationship was widely described as exceptionally close and entirely platonic. She was reportedly treated as a member of his family — a dynamic that now lies at the heart of the ongoing legal dispute over Simmons’ estate.
Timeline: Events Following Richard Simmons’ Death
July 13, 2024 — Richard Simmons dies of accidental causes at age 76.
July 18, 2024 — An open-casket viewing is held, after which Lenny Simmons and his wife take Reveles to a law firm to discuss Richard Simmons’ financial affairs. Reveles signs a document declining her role as co-trustee, later asserting that Lenny coerced her into doing so at a time when she was emotionally vulnerable and did not understand the consequences of the decision.
September 2024 — Reveles formally vacates Richard Simmons’ home after Lenny Simmons asks her to leave the property so it can be prepared and listed for sale.
December 2024 — The court reinstates Reveles as a co-trustee of Richard Simmons’ trust after she challenges her earlier resignation, despite opposition from his brother. However, the reinstatement is limited: Reveles is appointed only as an interim co-trustee pending the outcome of further litigation. As a result, Reveles and Lenny Simmons are required to work together in administering the trust — an arrangement that has continued to fuel conflict and stall administration.
February 2025 — Reveles files court documents accusing Lenny Simmons of mismanagement. She notes that he spent over $843,000 from the trust without her approval, including $567,000 on legal fees to sideline her and $277,000 for 24-hour armed security to guard Richard Simmons’ Hollywood Hills home.
March 2025 — Lenny Simmons files a petition seeking the return of nearly $1 million in personal property (including a $219,000 diamond ring), which he alleges Reveles took upon vacating Richard Simmons’ home. Reveles, however, maintains the items were gifts from 2014.
June 4, 2025 — Richard Simmons’ 4,000-square-foot Hollywood Hills mansion is officially listed for sale at $7 million.
November 21, 2025 — Lenny Simmons files a new petition seeking the permanent removal of Reveles as co-trustee. In the filing, he alleges that Reveles harbors a “personal vendetta” stemming from her exclusion from a multimillion-dollar life insurance policy and is deliberately obstructing trust administration by refusing to carry out necessary tasks without legitimate cause.
December 2025 — Lenny Simmons seeks the appointment of a special administrator with broad authority to assume full control of the administration. He offers to resign from his own role if Reveles agrees to do the same, asserting that such a step is necessary to end the ongoing “financial and legal squabbling.” In addition, he asks the court to strip Reveles of her beneficiary status, alleging that her conduct violates the estate’s no-contest clause.
Key Legal Issues in the Richard Simmons Estate Battle
At its core, the Richard Simmons’ estate dispute between his brother and longtime housekeeper shows how estate and trust administration can break down when authority is unclear, documentation is lacking, fiduciary relationships are strained and personal dynamics interfere with legal obligations.
Control Over Richard Simmons’ Estate
A central issue in the dispute concerns who is authorized to make decisions regarding Richard Simmons’ estate and trust. Both Lenny Simmons and Reveles were named as co-trustees, but her resignation and subsequent successful challenge to that resignation created uncertainty about who holds formal decision-making authority.
“Courts are often asked to intervene when authority is disputed, particularly when one fiduciary is pitted against another and claims of misconduct or mismanagement arise,” says Roee Kaufman, partner at Keystone Law. “When fiduciary disputes remain unresolved, estate administration can stall, making judicial intervention necessary to prevent harm to the estate.”
Accusations of Undue Influence, Intimidation or Fraud
Undue influence, intimidation, or fraud often underlie contested fiduciary resignations, particularly when emotions run high following a loved one’s death. Reveles claims Lenny Simmons and his wife pressured her into stepping down as co-trustee while she was under extreme emotional distress, having just attended Richard Simmons’ open-casket viewing and discovered his body days earlier.
“It is generally a problem when decisions with far-reaching consequences are made without legal counsel or a full understanding of the effects,” notes Shawn Kerendian, Keystone’s managing partner. “In such circumstances, undue influence or other forms of misconduct often arise, raising serious concerns for the court.”
Courts closely scrutinize agreements executed immediately after a death. If misconduct is proven, documents may be invalidated, prior actions reversed and responsible parties exposed to personal liability.
Alleged Misappropriation of Richard Simmons’ Personal Property
Disputes over personal property are common after a death. In this case, Lenny Simmons accuses Reveles of removing approximately $1 million in jewelry, artwork and other valuables from Richard Simmons’ home. Reveles contends that the items were gifts given to her in 2014.
“While Richard may have gifted these items during his lifetime, courts rely on documentation — written agreements, inventories or other evidence — to determine rightful ownership,” Kaufman explains. “Absent such proof, conflicts arise, requiring courts to decide whether property was legally transferred or remains part of the estate.”
Proving entitlement often requires forensic accounting, witness testimony and potentially costly litigation.
Possession, Access and Use of Estate and Trust Property
A major source of conflict involves who may occupy, access and control Richard Simmons’ home after his death. Tensions arose over Reveles’ continued occupancy, security measures taken by Lenny Simmons and related issues.
“Even if Richard intended for his housekeeper to use and enjoy his home after death, unless this is specified in estate documents or a valid agreement, a co-trustee generally cannot occupy trust property without facing allegations of fiduciary misconduct,” Kaufman warns. “Courts are often asked to enforce possession rights to protect assets and prevent disputes when boundaries are unclear.”
Trust Administration and Potential Mismanagement
Both Lenny Simmons and Reveles accuse each other of potential mismanagement. Whether these claims reflect legitimate concerns is yet to be determined.
“Excessive litigation costs, unnecessary security expenditures or misappropriation of property may constitute mismanagement,” says Kerendian. “Trustees have a fiduciary duty to act in beneficiaries’ best interests. When co-trustee conflicts create deadlock, courts may appoint a neutral fiduciary to keep administration on track.”
Important Lessons to Learn From the Richard Simmons Estate Dispute
The legal battle over Richard Simmons’ estate offers several cautionary lessons for anyone involved in trust or estate administration, whether as a fiduciary or a beneficiary. The case underscores how quickly disputes can arise, drain resources and create lasting conflict when proper estate planning, communication, cooperation or fiduciary oversight is lacking.
Early Legal Guidance Can Prevent Costly Missteps
Grieving loved ones often delay seeking legal advice, but failing to do so can have serious consequences, as this case illustrates.
“It is possible Lenny Simmons and his wife targeted Reveles shortly after Richard’s death to catch her emotionally vulnerable and convince her to cede her co-trustee rights,” says Kaufman. “Had Reveles had legal counsel, she likely would not have given up her role, eliminating the need for litigation to reinstate her later.”
Proactive guidance from an experienced probate attorney can help parties act in their best interests, avoid unnecessary conflict and protect estate assets.
Co-Trustee Arrangements Can Create Deadlock
While co-trustees are sometimes appointed to provide checks and balances, they can also stall administration if documents lack clear decision-making authority and all trustees must agree on decisions.
“Clashes between co-trustees or co-fiduciaries can halt administration and force court intervention,” notes Kerendian. “In situations with potential conflict, appointing a single trustee or a neutral fiduciary is often more effective.”
Final Takeaway: Who Will Inherit Richard Simmons’ Money and Assets?
It remains unclear exactly who is entitled to inherit Richard Simmons’ assets, as his estate planning documents have not been publicly disclosed. While wills generally are public record in California, Simmons’ will was reportedly established through a trust, which is private.
Both Lenny Simmons and Teresa Reveles are currently positioned to potentially inherit from the estate. However, Lenny Simmons’ recent petition to disinherit Reveles could affect her status as a beneficiary. Keystone will continue to update this article as new information becomes available.
Facing a trust or estate dispute?
Tensions between family members after a loved one’s death can quickly escalate into full-blown trust or estate disputes requiring litigation if such matters aren’t handled proactively and with care. If you are involved in a contested estate or trust, inheritance dispute or fiduciary conflict, Keystone’s probate attorneys can help you understand your rights, devise a legal strategy and pursue a desirable resolution. Contact Keystone today to learn more.
