Skip to content
  • Latest
2024 Success Stories
  • Call Today: 310.444.9060
  • Probate Services
    ▼
    • Trust & Will Disputes
    • Fiduciary Misconduct
    • Property Disputes
    • Elder Financial Abuse
    • Trust & Estate Administration
    • Conservatorship
    • Guardianship
    • Probate Appeals
  • Who We Help
    ▼
    • Executor / Administrator
    • Trustee
    • Beneficiary
    • Spouse
    • Power of Attorney
    • Conservator
    • Guardian
    • Creditor
  • Our Firm
    ▼
    • Attorneys
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • 10th Anniversary
  • Learn
    ▼
    • Blog
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletters
    • Testimonials
    • Whitepapers
  • Request a Consultation
  • Probate Services
    • Trust & Will Disputes
    • Fiduciary Misconduct
    • Property Disputes
    • Elder Financial Abuse
    • Trust & Estate Administration
    • Conservatorship
    • Guardianship
    • Probate Appeals
  • Who We Help
    • Executor / Administrator
    • Trustee
    • Beneficiary
    • Spouse
    • Power of Attorney
    • Conservator
    • Guardian
    • Creditor
  • Our Firm
    • Attorneys
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • 10th Anniversary
  • Learn
    • Blog
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletters
    • Testimonials
    • Whitepapers
  • Request a Consultation
  • Probate Services
    • Trust & Will Disputes
    • Fiduciary Misconduct
    • Property Disputes
    • Elder Financial Abuse
    • Trust & Estate Administration
    • Conservatorship
    • Guardianship
    • Probate Appeals
  • Who We Help
    • Executor / Administrator
    • Trustee
    • Beneficiary
    • Spouse
    • Power of Attorney
    • Conservator
    • Guardian
    • Creditor
  • Our Firm
    • Attorneys
    • Staff
    • Careers
    • 10th Anniversary
  • Learn
    • Blog
    • Case Studies
    • Newsletters
    • Testimonials
    • Whitepapers
  • Request a Consultation

Home » Blog » Revoking an Irrevocable Trust: Keystone Successfully Suspends Financially Abusive Son as Trustee and Invalidates a Qualified Personal Residence Trust

Last Updated: October 30, 2024

Revoking an Irrevocable Trust: Keystone Successfully Suspends Financially Abusive Son as Trustee and Invalidates a Qualified Personal Residence Trust

Elders are more susceptible than others to financial abuse, which often is perpetrated by those closest to them. If an elder is lucky enough to recognize the abuse, what is their recourse? If they have unknowingly handed over control of their finances to a trustee through an irrevocable trust, can they suspend the trustee and have the trust invalidated? Are they entitled to damages? A trust lawyer can not only help answer the aforementioned questions but can help victims of financial elder abuse whose trusts were created as a result of misconduct regain control of their finances.

Search

Overview

In this elder financial abuse case, our attorneys helped a client whose son had manipulated her into executing a Qualified Personal Residence Trust (QPRT) and then signing a deed transferring the primary asset of her existing trust — a three-unit income-producing property – into the QPRT.

Worse still, the son, who was sole trustee of the QPRT, had been pilfering money from the QPRT for his own personal benefit. The client was seeking to not only suspend her son as trustee of the QPRT, but to revoke the trust or have it invalidated.

In order to obtain a court order revoking an irrevocable trust, such as a QPRT, all the beneficiaries of the trust must agree to the revocation. Our client and her three children were the beneficiaries of the QPRT. While two of her children agreed to the revocation, the son who was the trustee of the QPRT refused to play along. If he were to have agreed to the revocation, he would have lost all control of the trust and its resources.

You may be wondering how a competent person can fall victim to undue influence and act against their own best interests. In this case, our client transferred her primary source of income into a QPRT that she never meant to create. Unfortunately, even a competent person can be manipulated.

To make our client more susceptible to his influence, our client’s son deliberately had been over-medicating her. She had been so impaired when her son took her to an attorney that she could not recall executing the QPRT or transferring her income-producing asset into it.

The QPRT was not even beneficial to our client. While this type of irrevocable trust can provide estate tax savings to individuals whose estates exceed the estate tax exemption threshold (which was $5.4 million the year our client executed the QPRT), our client’s estate was a fraction of that.

At the time she executed the QPRT, she had been temporarily incapacitated. As such, she had lacked the awareness to know she was gifting away her primary income-producing asset. Our trust dispute attorneys would later argue that since our client had lacked the requisite intent and capacity to create the QPRT, and was subjected to undue influence by her son, the QPRT should be invalidated.

TELL US WHAT HAPPENED. WE’LL BE IN TOUCH SOON.

Invalidating a Trust on Account of Lack of Capacity, Undue Influence and Elder Financial Abuse

In order for someone to create a trust or will, it is required that they be competent and have the intention to do so; otherwise, the document could potentially be invalidated by means of a trust contest based on lack of capacity and testamentary intent.

At the time the QPRT was executed, and a few months later, when the deed transfer was signed, our client lacked both capacity and intent. While competent in her everyday life, she had been in a state of heavy sedation when her son took her to an attorney to create the QPRT. By dispensing her the incorrect dosage of her medication, the son had induced her groggy state, which had left her feeling disoriented and confused. The client had no recollection of meeting the attorney or signing the QPRT.

It may also be possible to set aside estate planning documents if it seems they were procured by undue influence. Undue influence is defined under California law as “excessive persuasion that causes another person to act or refrain from acting by overcoming that person’s free will and results in inequity.”

Undue influence is a common form of elder financial abuse, and if it can be proven that an abuser took or obtained property from an elder by means of undue influence, the court may order the abuser to pay double or treble damages, as well as the plaintiff’s attorney’s fees and costs.

Elders are particularly vulnerable to financial exploitation, particularly because many of them are socially isolated and declining mentally. Additionally, they may not have anyone to help them keep tabs on their finances. However, in our client’s case, her son was able to unduly influence her because of his proximity to her.

“Keystone handles many cases like this one in which an elderly person is financially abused through undue influence,” says Shawn Kerendian, the founder and managing partner of Keystone Law Group, P.C. “Fortunately, there are legal measures that can be taken to prevent this kind of elder abuse. For instance, if the elder is competent, they can appoint an attorney-in-fact they trust to help them manage their finances. If the vulnerable elder lacks capacity, a loved one can try to obtain conservatorship over them.”

Trustee Suspension or Removal

The trustee of a trust is considered a fiduciary, which means they are obligated to always act in the best interest of the trust beneficiaries, or they could be accused of trustee misconduct. Their fiduciary duties certainly don’t permit them to personally gain by misappropriating or mismanaging assets belonging to the trust, as our client’s son did.

As the trustee of our client’s QPRT, the son was supposed to provide our client with the net income from her property at least once a quarter, which he never did. He also spent rampantly from the QPRT, using trust assets to fund his own lavish lifestyle.

The actions of our client’s son warranted legal action. He, at least, needed to be suspended as trustee of her QPRT, if not removed as trustee. In many instances, when a trustee’s actions are sufficiently egregious, they may even be surcharged and held liable for paying the attorney fees and costs of the plaintiff.

An In-Depth Look Into Keystone’s Undue Influence Case

It is rare for trust attorneys to file a petition to invalidate a trust while the trust creator (called the settlor, grantor or trustor) is still alive, since most trusts only become irrevocable after the trust creator dies. But QPRTs, like the one our client unknowingly signed at the urging of her son, are by nature irrevocable. And since irrevocable trusts can only be revoked if all the beneficiaries of the trust agree to the revocation, it was impossible for our client to have the QPRT revoked without the express consent of her son, the trustee of the QPRT.

As a result, Keystone’s only option was to secure a court order invalidating the trust due to lack of capacity, undue influence and financial abuse.

The client’s son did not have much going for him in terms of credibility. He had a history of addictions, which caused him to previously, on many occasions, misappropriate funds from our client’s bank accounts, misappropriate her possessions and even open new credit lines in her name.

At one point, the son even had our client sign a power of attorney while she had been heavily sedated to give him access to her finances. Our client vaguely remembered signing the power of attorney and revoked it as soon as she could, but a substantial amount of damage had already been done.

At the court hearing to invalidate the QPRT and suspend the son as trustee, Keystone’s probate attorneys argued that their client lacked capacity when she signed the trust document, and had been subjected to undue influence and financial abuse at the hands of her son — a predator with a demonstrated history of malfeasance and fraud.

Results

Hearing our trust attorneys’ compelling arguments around the son’s history of questionable conduct toward our client and her finances, the judge determined that the son’s behavior raised enough concern about financial abuse to immediately suspend him as the trustee of the QPRT and appoint the private professional fiduciary proposed by Keystone as an interim trustee.

 By devising a winning legal strategy, Keystone’s attorneys ultimately were able to convince the son to agree to a settlement in which he would give his consent to invalidate the QPRT and return control of its assets to our client.

 “If this QPRT had not been invalidated, our client basically would not have had any source of income in retirement or any control over her finances,” says Verlan Kwan, of counsel at Keystone who served as one of the client’s attorneys. “Thanks to our quick work to suspend the son as trustee and invalidate the trust, our client will be able to enjoy her retirement after decades of hard work.”

Elder Financial Abuse Stopped in Its Tracks

The swift action taken by Keystone’s attorneys to invalidate the QPRT and suspend the client’s son as trustee helped the client to retain her source of income during retirement. Without our attorneys’ efficient handling of this case, our client could have struggled to retire and to exercise any control over her finances, given that most of her assets were tied up in the QPRT. Our work also stopped the son from perpetrating more financial abuse against our client. While the client resided overseas, we worked hand-in-hand with the successor trustee to administer the trust and close it out.

My son, who I’d put through medical school was about to spend my entire life savings and sell my house. I had given him the legal authority to do so. He was challenging my ability to think for myself and retain legal counsel. He was playing dirty. I was lucky to have Verlan on my side. She really fought for me and eventually got the judge to void the document. Believe me when I say there is not a case Verlan can’t win

Read Full Testimonial

The Takeaway

Financial abuse runs rampant among elders. No one wants to believe their own family members could be the perpetrators of it, but they often are, as demonstrated by this case. The lesson is for elders to remain cognizant of their finances at all times. And if they are not well-versed in money matters, they should have an attorney or accountant assisting them.

If an elder lacks competence, then it is equally important for their attorney-in-fact or conservator of the estate to keep tabs on their financial affairs. The earlier misconduct is detected, the less damage the perpetrators will be able to inflict.

Learn More

Dealing with a trust dispute? Our attorneys can help you resolve it.

Trust and will disputes based on elder financial abuse are more common than you might think. Not only can the probate attorneys at our firm investigate and litigate elder financial abuse to have the problematic document invalidated, but they can provide you with legal options for protecting the vulnerable adult in your life.

Discover how our skilled attorneys can help you secure the outcome you want for your case by requesting a free consultation. Call us today!

Request a Consultation
Share Post
PrevPreviousRecovering Stolen Assets: Keystone Helps Retrieve Millions From a Decedent’s Financial Abusers
Read NextConverting Community Property and Separate Property: Community Property Presumption in California Prevails Over Title PresumptionNext
Related Articles
trustee looking at accounting software
Bad Trustee Case Study: Keystone Uncovers Trustee Misconduct
Read More
thumb-boehm-case-study
Falsely Accused of Elder Abuse: Keystone Proves Decedent Lacked Capacity to Execute New Trust, Securing Disinherited Clients Their Rightful Inheritances
Read More
woman sitting with children
Family Trust Distribution Case: Keystone Helps Co-Trustees Protect Money Held in Trust for Minor From Opportunistic Family Members
Read More
Subscribe to The Keystone Quarterly  

Stay up to date with the latest news in the exciting world of probate law through our quarterly newsletter, The Keystone Quarterly. 

Each issue provides insight into the latest probate developments, delves into some of Keystone’s more interesting cases, and gives important updates about our firm. The Keystone Quarterly is a must-read for attorneys and clients alike.

Linkedin Instagram Facebook
Contact
  • 11300 West Olympic Blvd.
    Suite 910
    Los Angeles, CA 90064
  • 310.444.9060
Contact Us
Linkedin Instagram Facebook
Company
  • Our Firm
  • Attorneys
  • Staff
  • Careers
  • 10th Anniversary
Probate Services
  • Trust & Will Disputes
  • Fiduciary Misconduct
  • Property Disputes
  • Elder Financial Abuse
  • Trust & Estate Administration
  • Conservatorship
  • Guardianship
  • Probate Appeals
Who We Help
  • Executor / Administrator
  • Trustee
  • Beneficiary
  • Spouse
  • Power of Attorney
  • Conservator
  • Guardian
  • Creditor
Learn
  • Blog
  • Case Studies
  • Newsletters
  • Testimonials
  • Whitepapers
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Sitemap
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Sitemap

©2025 Keystone Law Group, P.C. All rights reserved.

This website is for general information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Connection to this website, and communication to this law firm via email or other electronic transmission do not constitute an attorney-client relationship with Keystone Law Group, P.C. unless a separate written agreement is signed by you and Keystone Law Group, P.C. as to the nature of any relationship and the amount to be charged for the intended legal services.

Manage Cookie Consent
We use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. We do this to improve browsing experience and to show personalized ads. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}